THE BEST SIDE OF STABALL 6.5 LOAD DATA

The best Side of staball 6.5 load data

The best Side of staball 6.5 load data

Blog Article

Nebs mentioned: Exactly what is the profile on the load you at present are working with and they are contemplating substituting the Cheddite for that Gain primer? It might be beneficial to determine what the force envelope of the existing load is. Simply click to broaden...



If there was a difficulty inserting the primer, the region around the primer pocket can be concave not convex. None of the MEC Reloading equipment guidance the hull rim in the course of reprime or at some other point from the reloading procedure.

Are you aware Should the primer pocket resizer is effective over a hydraulic push? I am unsure if it would have the identical stress or more than enough force to try and do what it can be supposed to do.  

I planned to do the exam in practically nothing but as soon as fired hulls, so it has taken a while to burn off through the final rotation of hulls for getting to all refreshing hulls.

Insert to quote Only show this person #34 · Jan 22, 2022 I'm very sure NEBS has it right. Take a look at dimension B overall length of primer. Cheddite primers will be the shortest Remington hull is created for the Remington primers, as a result the cheddite primer has .002" clearance to the bottom of the outlet whil Winchester being the longest has .

Not so new member old aka prior to transferring to KY was Ohio Wildfowler ( used to be a moderator on a few discussion boards)

What I did do was point out which the Cheddite primer is often a Substantially closer match to your Federal 209A primer which no one would endorse to be a alternative for that Winchester 209 primer in ALL recipes.

This makes certain that your primers will continue being safe and protected For many years to come back. Furthermore, the primers feature a easy storage container, letting you to easily retail outlet and transport your primers without having be concerned.

i.e. in the correctly sane Remington hull load circled in red that is a cushty ten,000 PSI using a W209, what would the influence be towards the primer battery cup (button?) deal with if you merely switched from the W209 into winchester triple seven primers #209 muzzleloading a Ched 209 w/o lowering powder ?

Oh, I'll shoot them. I just have not seen a bulge in the head like I have with these primers. Just attempting to figure out the lead to/solution.

The force swing change just isn't as pronounced for much slower burn up fee powders, but it's however evident.

When I was on the lookout for load data I'd called Ballistic Goods (wherever I obtained the primers from). They advised me around the phone which i could swap inside a Cheddite primer for the W209 In case the tension was underneath 10k PSI.

they both of those ignite various quantities of powder, thrust sparks further in to the column, or contact roughly portions of the parts of powder they do ignite.

0   Reply This is certainly an more mature thread, you may not get a reaction, and will be reviving an aged thread. Make sure you look at creating a new thread.

Report this page